You include a quote from Dune in Fruit Fly’s acknowledgments: “Fear is the mind killer.” In Traumaland’s dedication, you say you want readers to be afraid after reading the book. What purpose is there to be found in fear?
Fear is a huge driving force in my life.
The fear of lots of things. Not being enough, not being seen, or not being able to be creative. That quote from Dune is my favourite quote because the only thing that gets in the way of me putting myself out there is fear. It destroys who we are. It removes our individuality, and it stops us from being able to be ourselves, because we're scared of being different.
The fear in Traumaland [stems from] the world - turning into a very scary place with the rise of AI and technology. That's why I write these dystopian thrillers for the YA market, because I want young people to become more aware of how worrying [the world they're growing up in] is. Fear is such a huge part of the human experience… so much about behaviour is about wanting to not feel fear.
Your YA books use dystopian and speculative elements to convey those scary topics, but Fruit Fly is rooted more in reality. Was the process of writing it different because of that?
Yeah, it was different. When you write for a YA market, that Hunger Games, dystopian thrill, Squid Game sort of thing is exciting. I love those kind[s] of stories, and I enjoy telling them, but I also feel like there's a thrill in writing reality. You’re right, Fruit Fly is based in a far more realistic concept. I actually found it scarier. It is an adult market, so there's more readers there, but I think people find the fears are more relatable in a way that's human.
I've enjoyed writing about the inner workings of someone's mind and how our minds can work destructively. I'm interested in the way personality and behaviours develop over time and why we develop them, why we become the people we are. I enjoyed being able to put that into Fruit Fly, in a way that perhaps YA novels are more plot-driven.
Without going into specifics, it's interesting how you’ve portrayed Mallory’s reasons for exploiting Leo. Why did you choose to write her this way?
There's a double-edged thing here. It's really important to make your characters— not likable, that's not my job— but to make you understand where they're coming from and why they're doing what they're doing… It was important for me to show Mallory not as a villain, but as someone in survival mode, a product of her own experience.
She's not evil, she's not bad. She's trying to survive, as Leo is. It was important that we showed that in the book because I didn't want it to be just an exploitative narrative. I wanted her to be genuinely trying to help herself. And then we could root for her a little bit as well. That complicates things further because we're like, Oh, what I'm actually rooting for is quite destructive.
Was that a factor in why you've included Mallory's connection to the gay community— her brother Nick? It doesn't justify what she does, but does it play a role in that?
It's her own self-justification of why she's doing what she's doing. She's saying, I have a right to tell this, 'cause my brother struggled with it. There's a confusion within her about whether it really is right. I don't think her relationship with Nick was great. So it's like, Oh, now in hindsight, I'm going to use my brother's experience to validate my own.
I wanted it to be murky. I don't want you to like what she's doing, but understand this is her trying to survive, and link herself in some way to this experience that she's writing about. The publishing world is pushing for her to authenticate herself. They want to hear those stories from her, she's got a link to it. They can authenticate what she's writing, and that is a way in for them to do it.